OLIVER JEREMANI ON LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE: SELECTION AND APPRAISAL OF DATA

Selection and appraisal of data are central functions in records and information management that support the systematic control of organizational information throughout its lifecycle. Because institutions generate large volumes of data, it is impractical and costly to preserve everything permanently. Selection therefore refers to the process of identifying records that have continuing value for administrative, legal, operational, evidential, or research purposes, while appraisal involves evaluating those records to determine their long-term value and retention requirements. These processes ensure that only meaningful, authentic, and useful information is retained, while redundant or low-value data are securely disposed of.

In digital environments, selection has become increasingly complex due to the exponential growth of electronic records. Organizations now operate within data-intensive systems that continuously produce information, making unmanaged retention inefficient and unsustainable. According to Mose et al. (2020), structured selection frameworks are essential for ensuring that records retained within electronic systems remain relevant, reliable, and capable of supporting organisational accountability and service delivery. Selection decisions are typically guided by retention schedules, institutional policies, and regulatory requirements, ensuring that only records with demonstrable value are preserved.

Appraisal complements selection by providing a structured evaluation of records to determine their continuing value and appropriate retention period. This process is often based on several value dimensions. Administrative value refers to the usefulness of records in supporting routine organisational operations, while fiscal value relates to budgeting, auditing, and financial accountability. Legal value ensures that records can serve as evidence in compliance or litigation contexts, and evidential value demonstrates how organisational decisions and activities were conducted. Historical and research value further justify the long-term preservation of records that contribute to institutional memory and knowledge creation (Lowry, 2021).

The emergence of digital recordkeeping systems has significantly reshaped appraisal practices. Unlike traditional paper-based records, digital records depend on evolving technologies for access and preservation, which introduces risks such as format obsolescence, system incompatibility, and loss of authenticity over time. Katuu (2020) notes that without deliberate preservation planning, digital records may become inaccessible or unusable as technologies change. Consequently, appraisal in digital contexts now extends beyond content evaluation to include technical considerations such as metadata quality, system interoperability, file format sustainability, and authenticity verification. These additional criteria help ensure long-term accessibility and usability of selected records.

Selection and appraisal processes also play a vital role in promoting accountability, transparency, and good governance within organisations. Properly managed records provide verifiable evidence of decisions, transactions, and service delivery activities, thereby strengthening institutional trust and compliance with regulatory frameworks. Ngoepe and Saurombe (2022) emphasise that effective appraisal systems support legal and regulatory compliance by ensuring that records are retained for appropriate durations and disposed of in a controlled and auditable manner. In addition, these processes help organisations reduce storage costs and minimise risks associated with retaining unnecessary or sensitive information.

Despite their importance, implementing effective selection and appraisal practices remains challenging, particularly in digitally driven environments. The rapid growth of data creates difficulties in consistently evaluating records for retention or disposal. Many institutions, especially in developing contexts, also face limitations such as inadequate policies, limited technical capacity, insufficient funding, and weak digital infrastructure. Chawinga and Ngwira (2021) observe that poor metadata practices and inconsistent digital preservation strategies further weaken appraisal processes, often resulting in either over-retention of irrelevant data or accidental loss of valuable records.

In conclusion, selection and appraisal of data are essential components of effective records management. They ensure that only information with continuing value is preserved while unnecessary data is removed in a controlled manner. These processes enhance organisational efficiency, support compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and safeguard institutional memory. As digital information continues to expand rapidly, the need for robust, well-structured selection and appraisal frameworks becomes increasingly critical for sustainable information governance.

REFERENCES

Chawinga, W. D., & Ngwira, F. (2021). Managing digital records in African public institutions:

Challenges and prospects. Information Development, 37(4), 612–624.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666921991527

Katuu, S. (2020). Enterprise content management implementation in South Africa. Records

Management Journal, 30(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-01-2019-0002

Lowry, J. (2021). Recordkeeping informatics and digital governance. Records Management

Journal, 31(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-05-2020-0018

Mosweu, O., Bwalya, K. J., & Mutshewa, A. (2020). A probe into the factors for adoption and

usage of electronic document and records management systems in the Botswana

context. Information Development, 36(1), 97–110.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918820988